Learn Korean - Phrase Builder
Negatory
Grades: 9 to 12
Downloads: 50,000-250,000
Num. Ratings: 917 Comments by Tony
- 12/10/2011
Koreanhear words
by Tony
- 12/10/2011
Koreanhear words
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
by Troy
- 10/12/2011
Good concept but the computerized voice is too fast for learners and has poor enunciation. Text to speech controls could be more obvious.
|